2026 Fantasy RB Rankings
The top 50 RBs for 2026 half-PPR leagues, ranked by our machine-learning model's projected fantasy points. Each projection comes with a calibrated 80% confidence interval — meaning 83% of actual outcomes fell inside our intervals in 2025 walk-forward testing.
Running back is the hardest position for projections: committee usage, injury rates, and coaching changes add noise. Our depth-chart-aware model still posts a 38% MAE edge over ADP for RBs.
| Rank | Player | Team | Proj Pts | 80% CI | ADP | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB1 | Jahmyr Gibbs | DET | 221.1 | 110–333 | 4 | LOW |
| RB2 | Bijan Robinson | ATL | 192.6 | 78–307 | 2 | LOW |
| RB3 | Christian McCaffrey | SF | 186.0 | 6–366 | 10 | MED |
| RB4 | Saquon Barkley | PHI | 182.3 | 35–329 | 3 | LOW |
| RB5 | James Cook | BUF | 180.4 | 62–299 | 32 | LOW |
| RB6 | Jonathan Taylor | IND | 179.3 | 48–310 | 22 | LOW |
| RB7 | Derrick Henry | BAL | 171.4 | 37–306 | 11 | LOW |
| RB8 | De'Von Achane | MIA | 169.3 | 71–267 | 17 | LOW |
| RB9 | Kyren Williams | LA | 160.9 | 45–277 | 25 | LOW |
| RB10 | Chase Brown | CIN | 147.9 | 42–253 | 22 | LOW |
| RB11 | Josh Jacobs | GB | 143.4 | 44–243 | 16 | LOW |
| RB12 | Tony Pollard | TEN | 138.0 | 53–223 | 64 | LOW |
| RB13 | D'Andre Swift | CHI | 135.5 | 47–224 | 61 | LOW |
| RB14 | Bucky Irving | TB | 128.6 | 17–240 | 16 | MED |
| RB15 | Chuba Hubbard | CAR | 127.4 | 58–196 | 44 | LOW |
| RB16 | Ashton Jeanty | LV | 127.2 | 0–262 | 10 | MED |
| RB17 | Travis Etienne | JAX | 126.0 | 18–234 | 90 | MED |
| RB18 | Kenneth Walker III | SEA | 123.8 | 40–207 | 42 | LOW |
| RB19 | Breece Hall | NYJ | 119.4 | 40–199 | 34 | LOW |
| RB20 | Javonte Williams | DAL | 116.2 | 24–208 | 99 | LOW |
| RB21 | David Montgomery | DET | 112.4 | 27–197 | 58 | LOW |
| RB22 | Tyrone Tracy Jr. | NYG | 108.2 | 19–198 | 74 | MED |
| RB23 | J.K. Dobbins | DEN | 95.1 | 13–178 | 111 | MED |
| RB24 | Isiah Pacheco | KC | 94.9 | 7–183 | 58 | MED |
| RB25 | Alvin Kamara | NO | 94.0 | 0–217 | 38 | MED |
| RB26 | Rhamondre Stevenson | NE | 93.9 | 12–176 | 108 | MED |
| RB27 | Zach Charbonnet | SEA | 93.3 | 11–175 | 96 | MED |
| RB28 | Rico Dowdle | CAR | 88.3 | 0–182 | 140 | MED |
| RB29 | Kareem Hunt | KC | 80.2 | 0–165 | 188 | MED |
| RB30 | Brian Robinson | SF | 78.1 | 0–169 | 100 | MED |
| RB31 | Jaylen Warren | PIT | 73.9 | 0–176 | 80 | MED |
| RB32 | Kenneth Gainwell | PIT | 72.5 | 0–171 | — | MED |
| RB33 | Rachaad White | TB | 72.3 | 2–142 | 130 | MED |
| RB34 | Omarion Hampton | LAC | 70.9 | 0–192 | 32 | MED |
| RB35 | Jordan Mason | MIN | 69.9 | 0–156 | 98 | MED |
| RB36 | Tyler Allgeier | ATL | 69.5 | 0–153 | 151 | MED |
| RB37 | Aaron Jones | MIN | 68.0 | 0–170 | 64 | MED |
| RB38 | TreVeyon Henderson | NE | 67.0 | 0–195 | 50 | HIGH |
| RB39 | RJ Harvey | DEN | 66.7 | 0–193 | 54 | HIGH |
| RB40 | James Conner | ARI | 63.3 | 0–178 | 50 | HIGH |
| RB41 | Jerome Ford | CLE | 62.9 | 0–151 | 132 | MED |
| RB42 | Nick Chubb | HOU | 61.6 | 0–137 | 140 | MED |
| RB43 | Tyjae Spears | TEN | 60.3 | 0–133 | 133 | MED |
| RB44 | Najee Harris | LAC | 59.6 | 0–164 | 104 | MED |
| RB45 | Ty Johnson | BUF | 57.9 | 0–129 | — | MED |
| RB46 | Quinshon Judkins | CLE | 57.4 | 0–178 | 95 | HIGH |
| RB47 | Devin Singletary | NYG | 54.3 | 0–124 | — | MED |
| RB48 | Michael Carter | ARI | 53.9 | 0–128 | — | MED |
| RB49 | Cam Skattebo | NYG | 52.2 | 0–147 | 106 | HIGH |
| RB50 | Chris Rodriguez Jr. | WAS | 49.7 | 0–117 | 184 | MED |
How to read this table
Proj Pts: half-PPR fantasy points our model expects over the full 2026 season. 80% CI: the interval 80% of actual outcomes should fall inside, based on 2025 calibration. A wide CI means more uncertainty — injury-prone players and rookies have wider intervals. ADP: half-PPR consensus average draft position from Fantasy Football Calculator. Risk: relative coefficient of variation (CI width / projection) bucketed into position quartiles.
What the model gets right that ADP misses
ADP is a wisdom-of-the-crowd signal — it reflects what drafters collectively think, not what actually happens. In our 2022-2025 walk-forward validation, consensus ADP explained only 9% of actual fantasy-point variance. Our model explained 59% — a 7× improvement.
The biggest gaps between model and ADP are surfaced on our Top Sleepers and Top Busts pages. The full War Room shows every player with filtering, VBD, scarcity, and draft-tracking.
Related Rankings
Get the Full Model in Your Draft Room
Every projection, 80% confidence interval, risk tier, and sleeper/bust call — live, in a single-page draft command center. Free to browse. $6.99 for a single draft, $24.99 for the full season.
ENTER THE WAR ROOM →