2026 Fantasy RB Rankings
The top 50 RBs for 2026 half-PPR leagues, ranked by our machine-learning model's projected fantasy points. Each projection comes with a calibrated 80% confidence interval — meaning 83% of actual outcomes fell inside our intervals in 2025 walk-forward testing.
Running back is the hardest position for projections: committee usage, injury rates, and coaching changes add noise. Our depth-chart-aware model still posts a 37% MAE edge over ADP for RBs.
| Rank | Player | Team | Proj Pts | 80% CI | ADP | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB1 | Jahmyr Gibbs | DET | 205.2 | 101–310 | 4 | LOW |
| RB2 | Bijan Robinson | ATL | 183.1 | 82–284 | 2 | LOW |
| RB3 | Saquon Barkley | PHI | 167.1 | 50–284 | 3 | LOW |
| RB4 | James Cook | BUF | 164.7 | 59–270 | 32 | LOW |
| RB5 | Christian McCaffrey | SF | 164.4 | 14–314 | 10 | LOW |
| RB6 | Derrick Henry | BAL | 163.1 | 46–280 | 11 | LOW |
| RB7 | Jonathan Taylor | IND | 161.5 | 26–297 | 22 | LOW |
| RB8 | De'Von Achane | MIA | 160.9 | 79–243 | 17 | LOW |
| RB9 | Chase Brown | CIN | 141.3 | 56–226 | 22 | LOW |
| RB10 | Ashton Jeanty | LV | 132.6 | 0–269 | 10 | LOW |
| RB11 | Kyren Williams | LAR | 130.7 | 41–220 | 25 | LOW |
| RB12 | Bucky Irving | TB | 126.9 | 30–224 | 16 | LOW |
| RB13 | Chuba Hubbard | CAR | 115.8 | 32–200 | 44 | LOW |
| RB14 | Kenneth Walker III | KC | 113.9 | 40–187 | 42 | LOW |
| RB15 | Tyrone Tracy Jr. | NYG | 110.6 | 20–201 | 74 | LOW |
| RB16 | Josh Jacobs | GB | 109.8 | 0–220 | 16 | LOW |
| RB17 | Breece Hall | NYJ | 104.0 | 27–182 | 34 | LOW |
| RB18 | D'Andre Swift | CHI | 103.0 | 4–202 | 61 | LOW |
| RB19 | Javonte Williams | DAL | 101.8 | 15–189 | 99 | LOW |
| RB20 | Zach Charbonnet | SEA | 98.5 | 9–188 | 96 | LOW |
| RB21 | Rico Dowdle | PIT | 84.8 | 0–175 | 140 | LOW |
| RB22 | Omarion Hampton | LAC | 83.1 | 0–198 | 32 | MED |
| RB23 | Isiah Pacheco | DET | 82.3 | 10–155 | 58 | LOW |
| RB24 | J.K. Dobbins | DEN | 80.8 | 0–173 | 111 | LOW |
| RB25 | TreVeyon Henderson | NE | 80.2 | 0–194 | 50 | MED |
| RB26 | Tony Pollard | TEN | 79.3 | 0–161 | 64 | LOW |
| RB27 | David Montgomery | HOU | 78.9 | 0–171 | 58 | MED |
| RB28 | RJ Harvey | DEN | 77.1 | 0–194 | 54 | MED |
| RB29 | Brian Robinson | ATL | 74.5 | 0–161 | 100 | LOW |
| RB30 | Travis Etienne | NO | 73.8 | 0–181 | 90 | MED |
| RB31 | Jaylen Warren | PIT | 72.6 | 0–163 | 80 | MED |
| RB32 | Alvin Kamara | NO | 71.6 | 0–175 | 38 | MED |
| RB33 | Rhamondre Stevenson | NE | 71.5 | 0–164 | 108 | MED |
| RB34 | Quinshon Judkins | CLE | 70.9 | 0–169 | 95 | MED |
| RB35 | Kareem Hunt | KC | 70.0 | 0–145 | 188 | LOW |
| RB36 | Jordan Mason | MIN | 69.4 | 0–152 | 98 | MED |
| RB37 | Jeremiyah Love | ARI | 67.0 | 0–276 | 0 | MED |
| RB38 | Aaron Jones | MIN | 62.9 | 0–143 | 64 | MED |
| RB39 | Tyjae Spears | TEN | 60.7 | 0–136 | 133 | MED |
| RB40 | Cam Skattebo | NYG | 60.0 | 0–146 | 106 | MED |
| RB41 | Tyler Allgeier | ARI | 59.3 | 0–137 | 151 | MED |
| RB42 | James Conner | ARI | 58.1 | 0–165 | 50 | MED |
| RB43 | Ray Davis | BUF | 54.8 | 0–135 | 143 | MED |
| RB44 | Rachaad White | WAS | 53.9 | 0–123 | 130 | MED |
| RB45 | Tank Bigsby | PHI | 53.7 | 0–127 | 118 | MED |
| RB46 | Kenneth Gainwell | TB | 52.9 | 0–148 | — | MED |
| RB47 | Davon Booth | CLE | 50.0 | 0–258 | 0 | MED |
| RB48 | TJ Harden | CLE | 50.0 | 0–258 | 0 | MED |
| RB49 | Jerome Ford | WAS | 48.7 | 0–138 | 132 | MED |
| RB50 | Coleman Bennett | CHI | 47.9 | 0–256 | 0 | MED |
How to read this table
Proj Pts: half-PPR fantasy points our model expects over the full 2026 season. 80% CI: the interval 80% of actual outcomes should fall inside, based on 2025 calibration. A wide CI means more uncertainty — injury-prone players and rookies have wider intervals. ADP: half-PPR consensus average draft position from Fantasy Football Calculator. Risk: relative coefficient of variation (CI width / projection) bucketed into position quartiles.
What the model gets right that ADP misses
ADP is a wisdom-of-the-crowd signal — it reflects what drafters collectively think, not what actually happens. In our 2022-2025 walk-forward validation, consensus ADP explained only 6% of actual fantasy-point variance. Our model explained 57% — roughly 9× more variance explained.
The biggest gaps between model and ADP are surfaced on our Top Sleepers and Top Busts pages. The full War Room shows every player with filtering, VBD, scarcity, and draft-tracking.
Related Rankings
Get the Full Model in Your Draft Room
Every projection, 80% confidence interval, risk tier, and sleeper/bust call — live, in a single-page draft command center. Free to browse. $6.99 for a single draft, $24.99 for the full season.
ENTER THE WAR ROOM →